Topic summary
19% 1 analyzed article/video 386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Chips results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 190 hits . Analysis detected 1,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,439 of 15,942 topics). This AI Chips is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. AI Chips
Topic details
Total words: 1,544
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.2% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 11.7%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst