Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video4,486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Bubble results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,766 hits. Analysis detected 12,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,458 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,291 of 16,562 topics). This Ai Bubble is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Ai Bubble
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 13,458
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.9% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.1%13.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos