Topic summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Boom results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Representativeness Heuristic , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 396 hits . Analysis detected 3,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ā 72% (4,779 of 16,562 topics). This Ai Boom is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Ai Boom
Topic details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Representativeness Heuris⦠Sitewide 1.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst