Topic summary
⁠94%2 analyzed articles/videos1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai And Employment results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 861 hits. Analysis detected 5,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,060 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,621 of 16,558 topics). This Ai And Employment is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Ai And Employment
Topic details
Total words: 3,060
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.1% percentile
5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 26.2%26.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.7%13.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.4%17.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 28.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Red Herring: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Special Pleading: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos