Topic summary
91%1 analyzed article/video712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Agent Vulnerabilities results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 2,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,292 of 15,919 topics). This AI Agent Vulnerabilities is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
AI Agent Vulnerabilities
Topic details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.0% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos