Topic summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video1,444 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Agroecology results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Nature as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 501 hits. Analysis detected 4,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,551 of 16,562 topics). This Agroecology is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Agroecology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,776
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos