Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,506 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Agrivoltaics results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 369 hits. Analysis detected 4,567 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ā 17% (13,774 of 16,562 topics). This Agrivoltaics is better (less manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
Agrivoltaics
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 17%Agrivoltaics (selected)2%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 6,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos