Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,087 analyzed words
BS Summary: These African Heritage results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 3,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,560 of 16,562 topics). This African Heritage is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
African Heritage
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos