Topic summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video652 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Afghanistan War results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 2,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,445 of 16,534 topics). This Afghanistan War is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Afghanistan War
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Horn Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos