Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video240 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aetna results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Status Quo Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 1,877 faulty-reasoning hits from 720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.7% and a BS Rank of 96% (663 of 16,562 topics). This Aetna is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group.
Aetna
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510096.0% percentile
13.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles720 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 21.8%21.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 25.6%25.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 43.3%43.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 20.0%20.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 21.7%21.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 12.8%12.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.8%23.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 43.3%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 15.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 21.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos