Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Advisory Committees results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 355 faulty-reasoning hits from 824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (6,671 of 23,505 topics). This Advisory Committees is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Advisory Committees
Topic details
Total words: 824
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles824 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos