Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Adultery In Politics results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 262 hits. Analysis detected 1,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Adultery In Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Adultery In Politics
Topic details
Total words: 2,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.7%11.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos