Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video1,142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Admissions results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Bandwagon, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 478 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,426 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (14,094 of 16,562 topics). This Admissions is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
Admissions
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,426
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos