Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adelanto Processing Center results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 55.7% saturation with 928 hits. Analysis detected 5,139 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,665 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (909 of 16,562 topics). This Adelanto Processing Center is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Adelanto Processing Center
Topic details
Total words: 1,665
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.5% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 55.7%55.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 35.9%35.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 31.5%31.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 33.4%33.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 23.8%23.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.3%11.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 55.7%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 35.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 33.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 31.5%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos