Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ada Compliance results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 930 hits. Analysis detected 6,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (9,990 of 16,562 topics). This Ada Compliance is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Ada Compliance
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,532
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.2%14.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos