Topic summary
52% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Account Takeover results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 483 hits . Analysis detected 4,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,390 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,502 of 16,562 topics). This Account Takeover is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Account Takeover
Topic details
Total words: 6,390
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst