Topic summary
8% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Account Security results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 259 hits . Analysis detected 2,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,978 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,150 of 15,447 topics). This Account Security is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Account Security
Topic details
Total words: 3,978
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst