Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Academy Awards results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 2,086 hits. Analysis detected 14,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,558 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,939 of 16,562 topics). This Academy Awards is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Academy Awards
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,558
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.8%19.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.0%10.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos