Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video966 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abuse In Sports results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 1,919 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,192 of 16,562 topics). This Abuse In Sports is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Abuse In Sports
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.7% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.1%8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos