Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Policy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.8% saturation with 2,238 hits. Analysis detected 12,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,993 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,724 of 15,854 topics). This Abortion Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Abortion Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,993
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.8% percentile
6.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 21.1%21.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 44.8%44.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 18.3%18.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 30.1%30.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 44.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos