Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Policy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Pessimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 44.8% saturation with 2,238 hits . Analysis detected 12,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,993 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (2,724 of 15,854 topics). This Abortion Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. Abortion Policy
Topic details
Total words: 4,993
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.8% percentile 6.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 21.1% 21.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 44.8% 44.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 18.3% 18.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 30.1% 30.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 44.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 19.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst