Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Pill results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 1,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,200 of 16,562 topics). This Abortion Pill is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Abortion Pill
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,000
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos