Topic summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abortion Buffer Zones results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 682 hits. Analysis detected 4,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,910 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,590 of 16,562 topics). This Abortion Buffer Zones is worse (more manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Abortion Buffer Zones
Topic details
Total words: 2,910
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510078.3% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 23.4%23.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.1%15.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.2%6.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.7%22.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos