Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,097 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 41 18 Law results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 663 hits. Analysis detected 4,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ā 59% (6,798 of 16,562 topics). This 41 18 Law is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
41 18 Law
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 59%41 18 Law (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.1%15.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos