Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 3d Television results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 733 hits . Analysis detected 5,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,713 of 16,562 topics). This 3d Television is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. 3d Television
Topic details
Total words: 5,876
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst