Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These 21st Road To Housing Act results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 454 hits. Analysis detected 3,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (13,031 of 16,562 topics). This 21st Road To Housing Act is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
21st Road To Housing Act
Topic details
Total words: 4,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos