Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These 1970s Cinema results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.1% saturation with 853 hits. Analysis detected 3,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,301 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This 1970s Cinema is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
1970s Cinema
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,301
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 37.1%37.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.1%22.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 37.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos