Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video163.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harper Lindsay results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 147 faulty-reasoning hits from 163.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (19,158 of 35,545 speakers). This Harper Lindsay is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Harper Lindsay
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠47%Harper Lindsay (selected)28%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 163.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
27.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos163.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.3%19.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The Stakes for Wake⁠5%
The Assembly NC⁠3%By Dylan Halper⁠4%7/30/2026, 3:55:00 AM