Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video205 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andreasen results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 349 faulty-reasoning hits from 205 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (24,498 of 35,542 speakers). This Andreasen is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Andreasen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠32%Andreasen (selected)19%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 205
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
18.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos205 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 29.3%29.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos