Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Winnipeg Free Press results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Framing Effect , and Straw Man , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 495 hits . Analysis detected 3,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,996 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 72% (109 of 386 publications). This Winnipeg Free Press is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,996
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Publication 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 12.4%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Publication 11.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst