Publication summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These GBH results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , In-Group Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 445 hits . Analysis detected 4,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,752 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 379 publications). This GBH is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,752
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.8% 1.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Publication 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Publication 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst