Publication summary
19% 20 analyzed articles/videos 12,153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Milwaukee results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 2,156 hits . Analysis detected 22,710 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,552 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 12% (490 of 556 publications). This Urban Milwaukee is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 53,552
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.9% percentile 0.8% BS Score20 analyzed articles53.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst