Publication summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,055 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Hindu results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 451 hits. Analysis detected 2,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,220 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 68% (122 of 379 publications). This The Hindu is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
The Hindu
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
2%Berkeleyside1%
68%The Hindu (selected)3%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 4,220
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

68% percentile
025507510068.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 7.8%7.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Publication 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos