Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These San Diego Jewish World results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 489 hits . Analysis detected 3,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 399 publications). This San Diego Jewish World is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,284
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 13.7% 13.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Publication 13.7%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst