Publication summary
60% 1 analyzed article/video 1,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hays Post results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 2,214 hits . Analysis detected 12,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 29% (278 of 389 publications). This Hays Post is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 22,272
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles22.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst