Publication summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Page Six results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 635 hits . Analysis detected 4,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 398 publications). This Page Six is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 5,000
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 10.0% 10.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst