Publication summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These KVIA results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 2,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,606 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 408 publications). This KVIA is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
KVIA
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%KVIA (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 3,606
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 13.3%13.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos