Publication summary
42%1 analyzed article/video356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KELO-AM results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 534 hits. Analysis detected 3,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 79% (88 of 398 publications). This KELO-AM is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
KELO-AM
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
79%KELO-AM (selected)4%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 4,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

78% percentile
025507510078.1% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 1.8%1.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Publication 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Publication 10.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos