Publication summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grenada Chronicle results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 743 hits . Analysis detected 4,062 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,026 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 79% (86 of 402 publications). This Grenada Chronicle is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 4,026
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 18.5% 18.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Publication 7.5% 7.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 18.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Slippery Slope: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst