Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These El Paso Inc. results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Hindsight Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 114 hits . Analysis detected 1,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 397 publications). This El Paso Inc. is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,104
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst