Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,090 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zanzibar results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 376 hits . Analysis detected 3,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,731 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,099 of 36,716 keywords). This Zanzibar is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Zanzibar
Keyword details
Total words: 3,731
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst