Keyword summary
72% 3 analyzed articles/videos 5,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yvette Cooper results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 3,996 hits . Analysis detected 19,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,464 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 44% (27,725 of 49,096 keywords). This Yvette Cooper is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Yvette Cooper
Keyword details
Total words: 20,464
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles20.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst