Keyword summary
89%1 analyzed article/video474 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Xbox Series X/S results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 1,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,422 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,031 of 35,284 keywords). This Xbox Series X/S is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Xbox Series X/S
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
86%Xbox Series X/S (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,422
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.7% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 34.7%34.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 34.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate