Keyword summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wy State Wire results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 438 hits. Analysis detected 3,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,300 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,850 of 36,408 keywords). This Wy State Wire is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Wy State Wire
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
51%Wy State Wire (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,300
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos