Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World War Two results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,901 hits . Analysis detected 14,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,830 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,393 of 37,533 keywords). This World War Two is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. World War Two
Keyword details
Total words: 18,830
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst