Keyword summary
91% 2 analyzed articles/videos 792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Meteorological Organization results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 1,488 hits . Analysis detected 9,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,307 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,166 of 37,536 keywords). This World Meteorological Organization is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. World Meteorological Organization
Keyword details
Total words: 8,307
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst