Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos5,531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wineries results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 5,635 hits. Analysis detected 28,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,108 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,264 of 37,536 keywords). This Wineries is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Wineries
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
49%Wineries (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles20.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 28.0%28.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.4%16.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 28.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate