Keyword summary
36%1 analyzed article/video930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Windham County results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 305 hits. Analysis detected 2,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,430 of 37,533 keywords). This Windham County is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Windham County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
35%Windham County (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos