Keyword summary
55% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Arnett results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 743 hits . Analysis detected 4,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,482 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,086 of 36,716 keywords). This Will Arnett is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group. Will Arnett
Keyword details
Total words: 4,482
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst