Keyword summary
18% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Refuge results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 364 hits . Analysis detected 4,628 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,853 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (30,990 of 34,426 keywords). This Wildlife Refuge is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Wildlife Refuge
Keyword details
Total words: 6,853
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst