Keyword summary
55%2 analyzed articles/videos1,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildberries results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 2,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,441 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (15,446 of 34,863 keywords). This Wildberries is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Wildberries
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
56%Wildberries (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,441
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos